The Home Mastering Masterclass - by Ian Shepherd

I'm excited! I just downloaded the first "package" of this Home Mastering Masterclass, by Ian Shepherd, and I must say it looks very very promising. I'm looking very much forward to checking out ALL the material and I'm convinced that I'll be learning a WHOLE lot over the course of those 8 weeks! I'm about halfway through the first video (called "Home Mastering Essentials") and I'm already picking up very useful tips! Love it. Here below you can read what Ian Shepherd (the master himself) has to say about his excellent new product.
(Or just go directly to the Home Mastering Masterclass home page!)
----

via productionadvice.co.uk

Have you watched all the videos, read all the blog posts, tried all the plugins – but when it comes to mastering in your own studio, you just can’t seem to fit all the pieces together?
Or, maybe you’re already having some success with self-mastering, but would love to know how the professionals do it? What the difference is between what you’re doing and “the real thing”? (Hint – it’s probably not as big a difference as you think…)

Is mastering a mystery to you?

Well, I know how you feel – I felt exactly the same, when I was starting out !

Who Am I?

My name is Ian Shepherd – I've been a professional mastering engineer for over fifteen years now, and I've mastered literally thousands of albums during that time. These days I run my own mastering company, Mastering Media Ltd – and I run the Production Advice website, where I help people make their music sound great.
What helped me most when I was just starting out working as a tape-op was sitting in on real mastering sessions with my colleagues, and getting an “insider’s view” of how they worked – of what they did, how they did it, and why.

The chance to be a “fly on the wall” gave me invaluable insights into the mastering process as a whole – what you’re trying to achieve, the different ways to do it, and how everything fits together into a simple process taking you from raw mix to the final master.

And I know lots of you would like the same opportunity – every week I get emails asking if someone can work as an intern with me, or sit in on a few sessions – or just asking general questions about the way that I work.
There just isn't enough time to address everyone's questions individually, though – and that's why I came up with the Home Mastering Masterclass.

What is it?

The quickest way to explain what the masterclass is all about, is to show you the introduction video. So, here it is !

What's included?

Introductory “Getting Started” video: “Home Mastering Essentials”

This video gives a broad overview of the course, explaining:

• The simple three-stage process I use when I master every single song I work on
• How to calibrate your mastering system by choosing an optimal mastering monitoring level
• Straightforward rules of thumb to guide your decisions for deciding levels, EQ balance and compression settings

7 Weekly Mastering Masterclass videos – “sit in” on a series of mastering sessions with me

Watch over my shoulder with a series of screen-capture “mastering masterclass” videos. I’ll master a different song every week, and tell you what I'm doing, why I’m doing it – and how

Weekly “Q&A” podcasts

Each week, email your questions to a dedicated address – ask me anything ! Every week I'll record a podcast as many of the popular and interesting questions as I can. Tell me what you want to know !

Universal techniques – “it ain't what you use”…

The videos show a large selection of software packages and plugins in action, including Pro Tools, Logic, Reaper, iZoptope Ozone, Waves and more – learn how to apply the techniques with your software of choice

All the essentials…

A comprehensive range of fundamental mastering techniques. I'll show you the core elements of every mastering chain – EQ, compression and limiting – and how to use them effectively

…and more advanced techniques

These only get used on one in ten masters – but when they're needed, they're invaluable. Learn how I use stereo width processing, Mid-Side EQ, parallel compression, stem mastering and more

A complete summary of my mastering chain, my process and philosophy

The final Home Mastering Overview video summarizes the masterclass videos and brings together all the information you need to get started mastering in your home studio, with an emphasis on my “Three M“s of mastering – monitoring, metering and mindset

 

Common questions answered

Will the videos apply to the kind of music I want to master?

Yes ! The videos cover a variety of different genres, including rock, pop, “soundtrack”, dance, metal, folk and jazz – so you can directly relate what I’m showing you to the kind of music you want to master

Songs have been contributed by:
Professional pop songwriters The Freefall Music Co
Electro/Dubstep artist Mat Lenihan, aka Fi-Chek
Soundtrack composer and World Music expert Dominik Johnson
Joe “Home Studio Corner” Gilder
Australian metal band Any Last Words
Guitarist & producer Richard Durrant, featuring English folk artist Terry Emm
Producer, mixer & musician Sigurdor Gudmundsson

Do I need specific software or plugins to get the best out of the course?

No. The methods and techniques in the course can be used with any decent digital audio workstation, and most quality plugins. The videos use a wide range of popular packages (see below) so there’s a good chance one of them will use software you’re familiar with.

Bonus in-depth interviews

Whenever I work on a real mastering session, I always take some time to talk to the client, to find out more about their music – how it was recorded, how they would like it to sound, and whether they have anything particular they hope to achieve with the mastering.
I've done the same for these videos, via Skype, and recorded the conversations so you can eavesdrop on this part of the process, too.

I’d originally intended these interviews to be an optional bonus, but what
surprised me was that the results are far more valuable than I ever expected !

Between all the songs we covered a huge range of topics, so there's a mass of helpful information there about writing, recording and mixing as well as mastering – so, I'm bundling them in with the videos and I strongly recommend you listen to them as well as watching the videos, to get maximum value out of the package.

Topics covered in the interviews include:

• Professional mixers – the benefits and pitfalls
• The advantages of using real instruments – how to fake a string section, or even get a real one on your recording
• The loudness war, and the thorny issue of loudness in clubs
• Fear of bass – and several different approaches to handling it
• Getting a guitar sound – amp, pod, or plugin ?
• Why mixing is like cooking a steak
• Acoustic treatment and monitoring – simple, effective tweaks
• When mastering isn't necessary – or reverb, either !

How It Works

Sign up today, and you get the “Home Mastering Essentials” video, the first Masterclass video and the first interview to download right away.
Watch the videos, try some of the ideas yourself and then email me with any questions you have or requests for more detail. I’ll answer as many as possibly in the weekly Q&A podcast.
There will be a new Masterclass video and interview to download every week, covering more and more advanced mastering techniques.
Finally you’ll get the concluding “Home Mastering Overview” video, which pulls everything together and adds more detail to some topics.

Here's the schedule:

Week 1: Home Mastering Essentials Video &
“Obvious” by the Freefall Music Co.

A professionally mixed pop tune to get us started. Topics include EQ, compression & limiting

Week 2: “UR Now” by Fi-Check

Storming electro house tune. Topics include EQ in more depth, stereo image processing and multiband compression

Week 3: “Roads” by Dominik Johnson

Beautiful acoustic soundtrack score, with Real Strings by Pete Whitfield. Feature topic: Parallel compression

Week 4: “Such Is Life” by Any Last Words

Masterful Aussie metal. Feature topic: using distortion and saturation effects

Week 5: “Behold” by Joe Gilder

Pop/rock epic (with gospel choir !) Feature topic: Mid-side EQ

Week 6: “Snow” by Terry Emm

Eccentric English folk (with dark rocky undertones). Feature topic: Stem mastering

Week 7: “Naim” by Sigurdor Gudmundsson

Icelandic jazz. Topics include dealing with EQ build-up, compression, stereo width

Week 8: Home Mastering – The Overview

Enhanced Additional Content – Further 50% Discount

If you’d like to get the maximum possible value from the course, you may like to choose the “Enhanced” package for a further 50% discount on two fantastic additional resources – the acclaimed “Mastering with Multiband Compression” eBook and video (worth £47) and “Home Mastering EQ” video pack (worth £67) which add even more depth and detail on these important home mastering topics.

Sign Up Now For 33% Discount

Special Introductory Price

Pay securely by PayPal

Money-Back Guarantee

I’ve had such a great reaction to the videos from everyone who has seen them, I’m certain you’ll find them useful too. I want you to be completely happy though, so if you’re not satisfied for any reason, just contact me within 30 days for a full refund, no questions asked - and the videos are yours to keep.
P.S. People have been asking me for a product like this for years, but I wanted to wait until I had the time to do it properly. I’m really proud of the final result, and I know you’ll get a massive amount of value from the videos, interviews and Q&As. To get started, click here !

via productionadvice.co.uk

Posted via email from Sigurdór's posterous

Pro Tools Software: Multitrack Drum Editing, Part 2

via avid.com

Copyright 2011 Avid Technology, Inc.  Find a Reseller

Posted via email from Sigurdór's posterous

via The Source - Top 10 Tips for Choosing a Microphone

Top 10 Tips for Choosing a Microphone

1. Which type? Condenser, dynamic, shotgun, stereo pair…?

Studio condenser mics have large diaphragms, typically 1”, for high sensitivity and a wide frequency range which is ideal for recording vocals, acoustic guitar or similar instruments. They also come with a range of different pick-up patterns: cardioid is the commonest and the pattern is heart-shaped (hence the name) so it picks up primarily from the front and sides and rejects sound from the rear, which also suits vocals and acoustic instruments where excessive sound reflections from the walls, floor and ceiling may colour the sound with an unpleasant ‘boxy’ quality.

Figure of eight pick-up pattern is like two cardioid patterns on top of one another and facing opposite sides – great for backing vocals with two people either side of the mic. Omni-directional mics pick up sound equally from all directions, and can be good for situations where you want to gather a wide sound field, for example a choir in a beautifully reverberant church, or to gather ‘room sound’ to mix in with a more directional mic nearer the actual sound source – here’s a chart of some of the most commonly encountered mic polar patterns:

Dynamic mics are less sensitive and need to be closer to the sound source but they can also handle sudden transients better in some situations and they can supply a tighter, more focused sound – ideal for mic-ing individual drums in a drum kit, or for close mic-ing guitar amplifiers. They are also less sensitive to handling noise so they’re ideal for handheld vocal use – the ubiquitous Shure SM58 is a good example of this.

Broadcast mics are similar to studio mics but are often designed to be pointed end-on to the sound and are frequently dynamic rather than condenser mics because with less sensitivity they won’t pick up so much extraneous sound from the room and will frame the source immediately in front of them.

 Shotgun mics are a special type of condenser mic with an even more tightly focused pick-up pattern known as hyper-cardioid, where sound is almost entirely rejected from the sides as well as the back. They are often used in noisy situations where a single sound source needs to be isolated as much as possible from its surroundings – interviews in public arenas, nature recordings or film sets, for example.

 Where a stereo recording is needed you have the choice of using a matched pair of mono mics or a dedicated stereo mic. These feature two separate capsules mounted on the same mic body and can be a lot quicker and easier than having to set up a pair of separate mics and worry about exactly which stereo configuration to use – the Rode NT4 is a great example of a ready-made X-Y Stereo mic.

 (Stereo and Surround recording will be covered as separate subjects in one of the next Source Distribution Top 10 Tips series of articles).

2. The Type of connection 

 Mics come with a variety of different connector types so you need to make sure that the mic you buy will connect to the equipment you’re using to record. The most common connector type is the three pin XLR, the industry standard found in studios all over the world because of its ruggedness and reliability. Some mics such as certain stereo models and those intended for use with prosumer video cameras or to plug directly into PC soundcards will have a mini-jack plug like those found on inexpensive headphones. One thing to beware of here is the difference between mono and stereo mics: some mono mics will use the three-pin XLR but must be connected to a mono input (the extra pin carries an inverted copy of the sound waveform for noise rejection purposes) whereas stereo mics using a mini-jack connector must be connected to a stereo input, because the connector is carrying both channels. That being said almost any type of adaptor can usually be found if you need to connect your mic to an input with a different type of socket.

3. Power source – Phantom, battery or bus? 

 Condenser mics - where the actual diaphragm has a tiny electrical charge applied across it and variations in that charge under different air pressures are what the mic senses – need a power source and that power has to come from somewhere. Some let you use a battery, but as you go higher up the microphone food chain the more professional mics all tend to use ‘phantom power’ (officially 48V but often much lower) which is supplied down one of the pins in the mic’s connector (another reason for the popularity in pro circles of the three-pin XLR). If you want to use a mic that requires phantom power you need to make sure that the pre-amplifier, soundcard, mixer or other unit you’re sending the mic’s signal to supplies phantom power as part of its specification – if not, you’ll have to stick with a condenser that can use an internal battery, or with a dynamic mic.

 One other option if you don’t have your own phantom power is to use a valve mic such as the Rode NTK, K2 and Classic II (where valves are used as part of the mic’s amplification system to which they impart an extra degree of warmth and character) as these have their own custom power supply for the valve itself and they also supply phantom power to the mic as part of the package.

There are also various USB mics such as the Rode Podcaster that plug directly into a Mac or PC’s USB connection and derive their operating power from there as well as transmitting the audio directly down the USB connection without any other power being needed.

  4. To pre-amp or not to pre-amp

 There are three basic levels of signal in audio systems: the loudest are those that drive loudspeakers; the middle one is known as line level and is the level at which audio is sent between different pieces of equipment in the studio; the lowest level is microphone level and you will always need some way of raising the very low levels produced by your microphone to line level where they can be recorded, processed and transmitted. The circuit used to do this is known as a Microphone Pre-Amplifier (‘mic pre-amp’ or even ‘mic pre’ for short). Sometimes these are incorporated into computer soundcards so that you can plug a mic directly into them, sometimes people use dedicated standalone units and where these units also include facilities to compress or limit the signal volume, or to re-balance it tonally using tone equalisation controls they are often known as Channel Strips (because they include the controls that would be found on just one strip of a full mixing desk).

 How you amplify your mic signal depends on how critical the quality is and what budget and other kit you have to hand. If you’re recording for fun and you’re perfectly happy with the mic pres on your computer soundcard’s mic inputs (and these days most computer soundcards are extremely good, way beyond what was available even 5 years ago) then you’re good to go. If you feel that the quality you have onboard is less than you want (or if you have a soundcard that doesn’t have mic inputs and will only accept line level signal) then there are a huge range of units available for use as mic pres, with or without lots of bells and whistles and ranging in price from well under a hundred pounds to many thousands of pounds – we’ll be covering selection of the right Mic Pre-amp for your needs in a forthcoming Source Distribution Top 10 Tips article.

5. Size is important… 

 It’s not always an issue but sometimes size can be a consideration for microphone selection. The most obvious case is where you need a small mic to be out of sight on a speaker’s clothing (e.g. the new Rode Pinmic) but another common situation is where you mount a mic on top of a video camera and need to ensure that the end of it doesn’t show in the picture area: shotgun or semi-shotgun mics come in a variety of lengths so it’s worth doing some research, perhaps popping along to a retailer with the camera you intend to use to try out some different models.

 And whilst larger mics with larger diaphragms produce a wider frequency response they are also more subject to differences in response due to being slightly off-axis to the mic – for example a group of four backing vocalists all round one mic will record with slightly different tonal characteristics depending on the angle at which their voices hit the mic, which is why small diaphragm condenser mics such as the Rode NT5, NT55 or NT4 which all have ½” diaphragms are often used for middle distance recordings such as choirs of orchestras, as the smaller surface area of their diaphragms gives a more even frequency response from wide angles of incidence.

 6. Mountings and environments

Another area to consider is how you’re going to mount or support your mic and whether you’ll want to use it in any unusual environments or locations. Most mics will come with some kind of mic clip or holder: dynamic mics only need a simple mic clip because they’re not prone to problems with noise transmitted up the mic-stand or from handling, whereas more sensitive condenser mics heed a shock-mount, which holds the mic in a cradle of elastic suspension – if the mic doesn’t come with one of these already you can normally buy one as an accessory.

If you plan to record in unusually hot, cold, dusty or humid conditions it’s also worth checking whether this might be a problem: moisture in particular is something that condenser mics are not fond of; it can settle on the diaphragm and lead to uneven response, pops and crackles so you may be better off with a condenser mic or a mic specially designed for extreme conditions such as the Rode NTG3, which uses a technology known as RF-bias rendering it almost completely resistant to moisture, making it one of the only options in any environment where condensation is an issue.

7. Performance specs – Frequency response, self-noise, distortion, maximum SPL?

How concerned you are about the performance specifications is a very individual thing: some people pay great attention to low self-noise (i.e. the noise generated by the mic’s own internal diaphragm and associated electronics), where the benchmark is currently set by the Rode NT1A which at 6dBA is the world’s quietest mic. Others maintain that with the 144dB of dynamic range available with 24 bit recording there’s no longer any need to worry, and these days any professional microphone should be well within acceptable limits for all but the most demanding high-end applications.

Likewise frequency response (what the lowest and highest frequencies are that the mic will accurately pick-up and how that differs according to how near the mic’s main pick-up axis you stand): figures these days for any pro or semi-pro mic are usually way better than most users would need and it’s often more of an issue getting rid of high and low frequencies that you’d rather had never found their way onto the recording in the first place, particularly in the case of condenser mics.

Distortion and maximum Sound Pressure Level are closely connected – the maximum Sound Pressure Level that the mic will record before it starts to distort through over-loading is always something to be aware of, but other than in certain obvious cases (such as close mic-ing a kick drum or Noddy Holder) most modern mics will happily deal with a huge 120dB or more so that you’ll seldom be aware of any limitations. 

8. Reliability & local servicing facilities

It may seem obvious but have a look at online forums and similar places to get an idea of how reliable your shortlisted mics are considered to be by end-users! With

mics as with anything else you get what you pay for: £900 will usually buy better performance and work perfectly for longer than a £90, but the level of use it’s subjected to is a big factor: one of the things that distinguishes professional from consumer equipment is that pro gear is designed to cope with a high level of use without complaint – 12 hours a day, 7 days a week for years at a time, where consumer kit which will work perfectly for  many years if used for a few hours at a time might show signs of strain if subjected to such high pressures. Be realistic about your needs: there’s no point buying a tank if an SUV will do, and money saved on your mic could usefully be put towards a better soundcard or channel strip…

The availability of local repair facilities will hopefully never concern you – but if you should need to get your mic repaired or serviced then being able to do so easily and quickly within your locality can be a big advantage and the difficulties and extra costs of having to deal overseas can sometimes be considerable: money you save on a cheap ’grey import’ can quickly be lost this way.

The length or Warranty offered by a mic manufacturer can be a big plus here: Rode offer a unique 10 Year Full Warranty on all their microphones with local servicing around the world, other companies may not be so helpful.

9. Pads and filters…

Other very useful extra features that some mics offer include the ability to reduce the sensitivity of the mic to deal with widely differing sound pressure levels – this is called a pad and commonly allows reducing levels by 10 and 20 dB. If you think you might use the mic on anything from whispered vocals to a kick drum then this is well worth looking for.

Low-pass filters remove very low frequencies such as the rumble that can sometimes be transmitted up a mic stand and ruin otherwise perfect vocal takes. Several Rode mics including the NT2A, NT55 and M3 feature switchable polar patterns and pads, and some models such as the NT2000 and K2 feature continually variable patterns and pads giving even greater flexibility.

10. Accessories & extras…

Last but not least, value for money: what do the manufacturers of the microphones you’re considering throw in to sweeten the deal? Many companies bundle pop-shields, shock-mounts, cables and protective pouches with their mics at no extra cost which allows you to get up and recording straight out of the box with no need for further purchases – Rode for example do this with their NT1A Pack and NT2A Pack: a quick trip to the shops in the morning and by tea-time you could be tracking your first Number One!

via sourcedist.tumblr.com

Posted via email from Sigurdór's posterous

Chris Lord-Alge - quote

I would rather compress a vocal hard to get some personality out. It's like putting a snazzy jacket on a guy when he goes out at night — it adds attitude.

via mixonline.com

Posted via email from Sigurdór's posterous

Via Bobby Owsinski's Blog: Michael Jackson's "Beat It" - Isolated Drums

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Michael Jackson's "Beat It" - Isolated Drums

Today we're going to take a listen to the isolated drum track on Michael Jackson's seminal Beat It, one of the many singles off of his best selling Thriller album. Supposedly this 1982 crossover hit was Michael's answer to Quincy Jone's prodding, "Why don't you write something like My Sharona."

Listen to the isolated drum track by late great Jeff Pocaro and notice:

1) Pocaro plays to a drum machine and does so incredibly well. This was especially difficult in 1981 when the tune was cut, since many drummers had a tough time with a click during that era, let alone a full-on drum beat. Today this isn't such a big deal since everyone is brought up playing to loops and tracks, but it was no easy task back then. There are only two places, at 3:31 and 3:47, where you hear the slightest of flams.

2) The drum sound is nothing special. But then again, how could it be with the drum machine in the front of the mix. Engineer Bruce Swedien is the the master of track balances.

3) The drum track is simple and that's what's so beautiful about it. On the other hand, it couldn't be anything else and still work in the song.

Tomorrow - more Beat It.

via bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com

Posted via web from Sigurdór's posterous

The Beatles - Hey Bulldog (Isolated Bass & Vocals)

via youtube.com

Posted via web from Sigurdór's posterous

Via Bobby Owsinski's Blog: Michael Jackson's "Beat It" - Isolated Guitar and Bass

Michael Jackson's "Beat It" - Isolated Guitar and Bass

Today we'll look at the the isolated bass and guitars (mostly guitars) from Michael Jackson's 1982 hit Beat It. Let's dive right in.

1) There are 3 players that you hear; Steve Lukather plays the dirty rhythm parts and lead lines in the chorus and the bass (heard here on in the first verse), Paul Jackson Jr. plays the clean rhythm parts, and Eddie Van Halen plays the solo.

2) Most of the guitar parts are doubled. Take notice that they're not exact doubles though; one side is a bit busier than the other most of the time (always a good production practice).

3) Eddie Van Halen's solo at 2:42 is interesting because his guitar track is on the right side while the effects (delay and reverb) are on the right. Credit producer Quincy Jones and engineer Bruce Swedien for coping the sound of early Van Halen records on this solo. They wanted Eddie to play like himself and the best way was to give him the sound that he was used to.

----------------------------------

via bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com

Posted via web from Sigurdór's posterous